Euclidean 's direction space is
Rotation is the part of 's (direction-preserving) #link(<isometry>)[]
that preserves the direction space
The isometry of is (it can be proven that isometry implies #link(<affine>)[affine]
)
Rotation is
The element of with . Set-theoretically equivalent to
Also compatible in multiplication
The multiplication of elements in is equivalent to the multiplication of elements of length in . recall is #link(<normed-algebra>)[]
Question angle
_(tag)
Probably not the perfect motivation
Restricting the metric to yields #link(<metric-manifold>)[]
Intuitively, in Euclidean , we can "rotate", and the composition of rotations corresponds to the addition of "angles"
The latter should be the of 's #link(<Killing-field>)[]
as a one-parameter homomorphism to 's isometry
Calculate with #link(<geodesic>)[geodesic]
. Calculate geodesic with, for example, raw("stereographic projection coordinates"). For the geodesic starting at , the result is denoted as trigonometric-function
_(tag) trigonometric function . The power series expansion of at can be calculated using #link(<inverse-analytic>)[inverse function theorem]
Homomorphism is reflected in, according to power series
Or using Euler-formula
_(tag) , then using #link(<exponential>)[exponential function]
and complex number multiplication
Thus
Hyperbolic angle is the same