1. notice
  2. ไธญๆ–‡
  3. 1. feature
  4. ้€ป่พ‘
  5. 2. ้€ป่พ‘
  6. 3. ้›†ๅˆ่ฎบ
  7. 4. ๆ˜ ๅฐ„
  8. 5. ๅบ
  9. 6. ็ป„ๅˆ
  10. ๅพฎ็งฏๅˆ†
  11. 7. ๅฎžๆ•ฐ
  12. 8. ๆ•ฐๅˆ—ๆž้™
  13. 9. โ„^n
  14. 10. Euclidean ็ฉบ้—ด
  15. 11. Minkowski ็ฉบ้—ด
  16. 12. ๅคš้กนๅผ
  17. 13. ่งฃๆž (Euclidean)
  18. 14. ่งฃๆž (Minkowski)
  19. 15. ่งฃๆž struct ็š„ๆ“ไฝœ
  20. 16. ๅธธๅพฎๅˆ†ๆ–น็จ‹
  21. 17. ไฝ“็งฏ
  22. 18. ็งฏๅˆ†
  23. 19. ๆ•ฃๅบฆ
  24. 20. ็ฝ‘ๆž้™
  25. 21. ็ดง่‡ด
  26. 22. ่ฟž้€š
  27. 23. ๆ‹“ๆ‰‘ struct ็š„ๆ“ไฝœ
  28. 24. ๆŒ‡ๆ•ฐๅ‡ฝๆ•ฐ
  29. 25. ่ง’ๅบฆ
  30. ๅ‡ ไฝ•
  31. 26. ๆตๅฝข
  32. 27. ๅบฆ่ง„
  33. 28. ๅบฆ่ง„็š„่”็ปœ
  34. 29. Levi-Civita ๅฏผๆ•ฐ
  35. 30. ๅบฆ่ง„็š„ๆ›ฒ็އ
  36. 31. Einstein ๅบฆ่ง„
  37. 32. ๅธธๆˆช้ขๆ›ฒ็އ
  38. 33. simple-symmetric-space
  39. 34. ไธปไธ›
  40. 35. ็พคไฝœ็”จ
  41. 36. ็ƒๆžๆŠ•ๅฝฑ
  42. 37. Hopf ไธ›
  43. ๅœบ่ฎบ
  44. 38. ้ž็›ธๅฏน่ฎบ็‚น็ฒ’ๅญ
  45. 39. ็›ธๅฏน่ฎบ็‚น็ฒ’ๅญ
  46. 40. ็บฏ้‡ๅœบ
  47. 41. ็บฏ้‡ๅœบ็š„ๅฎˆๆ’ๆต
  48. 42. ้ž็›ธๅฏน่ฎบ็บฏ้‡ๅœบ
  49. 43. ๅ…‰้”ฅๅฐ„ๅฝฑ
  50. 44. ๆ—ถ็ฉบๅŠจ้‡็š„่‡ชๆ—‹่กจ็คบ
  51. 45. Lorentz ็พค
  52. 46. ๆ—‹้‡ๅœบ
  53. 47. ๆ—‹้‡ๅœบ็š„ๅฎˆๆ’ๆต
  54. 48. ็”ต็ฃๅœบ
  55. 49. ๅผ ้‡ๅœบ็š„ Laplacian
  56. 50. Einstein ๅบฆ่ง„
  57. 51. ็›ธไบ’ไฝœ็”จ
  58. 52. ่ฐๆŒฏๅญ้‡ๅญๅŒ–
  59. 53. ๆ—‹้‡ๅœบๆ‚้กน
  60. 54. ๅ‚่€ƒ
  61. English
  62. 55. notice
  63. 56. feature
  64. logic-topic
  65. 57. logic
  66. 58. set-theory
  67. 59. map
  68. 60. order
  69. 61. combinatorics
  70. calculus
  71. 62. real-numbers
  72. 63. limit-sequence
  73. 64. โ„^n
  74. 65. Euclidean-space
  75. 66. Minkowski-space
  76. 67. polynomial
  77. 68. analytic-Euclidean
  78. 69. analytic-Minkowski
  79. 70. analytic-struct-operation
  80. 71. ordinary-differential-equation
  81. 72. volume
  82. 73. integral
  83. 74. divergence
  84. 75. limit-net
  85. 76. compact
  86. 77. connected
  87. 78. topology-struct-operation
  88. 79. exponential
  89. 80. angle
  90. geometry
  91. 81. manifold
  92. 82. metric
  93. 83. metric-connection
  94. 84. geodesic-derivative
  95. 85. curvature-of-metric
  96. 86. Einstein-metric
  97. 87. constant-sectional-curvature
  98. 88. simple-symmetric-space
  99. 89. principal-bundle
  100. 90. group-action
  101. 91. stereographic-projection
  102. 92. Hopf-bundle
  103. field-theory
  104. 93. point-particle-non-relativity
  105. 94. point-particle-relativity
  106. 95. scalar-field
  107. 96. scalar-field-current
  108. 97. scalar-field-non-relativity
  109. 98. projective-lightcone
  110. 99. spacetime-momentum-spinor-representation
  111. 100. Lorentz-group
  112. 101. spinor-field
  113. 102. spinor-field-current
  114. 103. electromagnetic-field
  115. 104. Laplacian-of-tensor-field
  116. 105. Einstein-metric
  117. 106. interaction
  118. 107. harmonic-oscillator-quantization
  119. 108. spinor-field-misc
  120. 109. reference

note-math

For Schrodinger eq, harmonic oscillator potential

Calculate all ฮด action Lie bracket

This commutation relation is partially similar to complexification eigenvalue technique (ref-13, p.20โ€“30) (will be used in the treatment of angular momentum operator)

Complexify to get the characteristic operator of , obtaining [ladder-operator]

This commutation relation indicates that has eigenvalues with uniform spacing

Question Try to generalize the technique here to (if possible) classical harmonic oscillator

The lowest energy state of the eigenstates given by the ladder operator of harmonic oscillator quantization satisfies [harmonic-oscillator-ground-state]

Calculate the action of the operator, obtaining the lowest energy of

high order energy states (normalized)

Energy is

Using the eigenstate can be written as

is called Hermite polynomial

For quantum harmonic oscillator, even for static wave function, there are possible characteristic energies

Warning Don't assume that since the lowest energy is non-zero , there is energy out of nowhere, because the energy of a static hydrogen atom can still be negative

It can be proven that this eigenstate series orthogonally expands

For example, prove that expands using Fourier transform method

Assume that the orthogonal , define

Fourier transform

All order derivatives at are equal to zero

The quadratic form interpretation of the expansion coefficients is the probability in . The expected energy is

In addition to causing the eigenvalues of to be uniformly spaced, the ladder operators also satisfy , which allows them to correspond to

  • metric symmetric tensor space
  • symmetric polynomial space

They also satisfy

Since it is not , the situation for different states to complexified eigenvalue technique

[Gaussian-integral]

Holds for . contains dense points, consistent with the uniqueness of analytic continuation. Analytically continued to . But note that has a double branch.

Diagonalize the quadratic form into on Euclidean type using an orthonormal basis.

[why-pi-in-Gaussian-integral]

This might provide a clue as to why appears in the Stirling approximation of the factorial .

The characteristic polynomial of the harmonic oscillator ODE is , the prototype is , so and complex numbers are introduced, which leads to circles, and thus . is related to the ground state of the quantum harmonic oscillator. For simplicity, is omitted. The general momentum operator actually corresponds to a phase change . If we add a scaling factor to the momentum operator, then the momentum operator can correspond to a phase change . At this time, the ground state may also become where contains a factor, and its integral is directly normalized, without needing to add a scaling factor. Similarly, for Feynman path integrals, using this method may no longer require additional normalization factors or Zeta function regularization.

The appearance of in Stirling's approximation might also be similar. One should ask where the factorial (or its reciprocal) with the scaling factor comes from, for example, from the volume calculation of spheres and spherical surfaces.

Another revelation is that the appearing in the kernel of the Feynman path integral quantization of the harmonic oscillator corresponds to the property of the factorial function , where an additional scaling factor also appears. Therefore, should the modified factorial function satisfy ?

If the solution of the harmonic oscillator uses fixed starting positions , then

where

Action

where

For time only depending on the difference

[path-integral-quantization]

cf. (ref-28, ch.path-integral-formalism)

Propagator represents constructing unitary using Feynman path integrals and Lagrangian.

For free field

Decomposed into classical path and gap ,

  • Boundary is zero

==>

Now

Where, due to the classical path of a free particle being a straight line

  • Boundary is zero

==>

Now

As a generalization of Gaussian integral

  • Quadratic form
  • . To simplify notation, use

==> Eigenvalues . orthogonal eigenfunctions . Expansion of orthogonal eigenfunctions or Fourier expansion

Diagonalize with orthogonal basis. Now

Using the normalization from why-pi-in-Gaussian-integral, part of the infinite product becomes . The final result is

The total result is

For the harmonic oscillator, similar to

Using integration by parts

  • Quadratic form
  • . For simpler notation, use

==> Eigenvalues . orthogonal eigenfunctions . orthogonal eigenfunction expansion or Fourier expansion

Diagonalize using an orthogonal basis and a generalization of the Gaussian integral. The difference from the free field is the emergence of a new infinite product (cf. Euler-reflection-formula)

The result is

The total result is

[eigen-decomposition]

Characteristic equation given by

Decomposition of given by characteristic orthonormal basis

According to wiki:Path_integral_formulation, then let perform Taylor expansion, where corresponds to energy level

Regarding field quantization

One perspective is path integral quantization of fields.

[field-path-integral-quantization] Question Since the harmonic oscillator can be path-integrated by eigenvalue diagonalization & generalized Gaussian integral, why don't KG eq (or Dirac eq) similar to the harmonic oscillator eq also perform eigenvalue diagonalization & generalized Gaussian integral path integral?

Another (?) perspective is field operator quantization of fields.

recall Klein--Gordon-equation Consider the plane wave solution

If we ignore plane waves, even if we might lose accuracy, we get an ODE

This is the -valued point particle harmonic oscillator equation, with frequency

Then the point particle harmonic oscillator can be quantized

recall linear-superposition-of-KG-eq superposition of KG plane waves on the hyperboloid

Question Homomorphize the quantum harmonic oscillator of point particles to the quantum harmonic oscillator of the KG field, with coefficient constraint (Sobolev), the coefficient constraint of multiple raising and lowering corresponds to symmetric tensors, the entire space is (where is the space of harmonic oscillator quantization)

Question Is this tensor based on the module?

Vacuum is something lower than zero order

The energy operator of the KG field quantum harmonic oscillator can also be expressed in the form of KG field operator + energy of the KG field, even if this is not calculating the energy of the KG field (field operator after differential plane wave expansion)

For the Dirac field, it seems that there is no need to do what the KG field does, because "once" quantization already exists, but it is finite-dimensional, a representation comes from the two eigenvalues of Pauli-matrix (ref-18, p.305โ€“308)

After adding parity, it is

recall linear-superposition-of-Dirac-eq superposition of Dirac plane waves on

Question Homomorphically map it to the quantum field of the Dirac field, plus coefficient restriction (Sobolev), the coefficient restriction of multiple raising and lowering corresponds to alternating tensor, the entire space is

Question Is this tensor based on the module?

Vacuum is something lower than zero order

The energy operator of the Dirac field quantum field can also be expressed in the form of Dirac field operator + energy of the Dirac field, even if this is not calculating the energy of the Dirac field