Approximation of Relativistic Scalar Field Action to Non-Relativistic Scalar Field Action
Using a massive field, extracting the rest energy phase , using time and the speed of light limit
for #link(<Klein--Gordon-Lagrangian>)[]
, restore Planck constant , speed of light , time
use
let
use
the term multiplied by will cancel out the mass term
the term multiplied by will cancel out the speed of light factor
the term multiplied by will become , vanishing in the limit
might not affect it?
Multiply the entire expression by to get
Non-relativistic scalar field Lagrangian, alias Schrodinger-Lagrangian Schrodinger-Lagrangian
_(tag)
Can add a gauge field electrostatic potential term to the action, i.e., change to
Non-relativistic scalar field equation, alias Schrodinger-equation Schrodinger-equation
_(tag)
For either relativistic or non-relativistic scalar fields, it's possible to use a time plane wave mixed static solution to obtain the eigenvalue equation
One can also add static magnetic potential, is changed to , with
Schrodinger-eq-potential-example
_(tag) Example
-
Resonator (one or more) represents the electric potential of constant charge density in or spherical regions. . Opposite charges correspond to elliptical type, same charges correspond to hyperbolic type.
-
Hydrogen atom model (single particle, static, zero spin) represents a spherically symmetric electric potential generated by a point charge or a spherically symmetric charge sphere.
Using symmetry + Gauss's theorem
Or using differential equations, spherical symmetry + charge concentrated at a point or spherical region, then outside ==> ==>
Warning The Schrodinger equation has no analytical solution for atoms and molecules other than hydrogen atoms for the time being. I also don't know the existing multi-particle models and how effective their numerical calculations are.
-
box/ball potential well/barrier
-
constant electric field or constant magnetic field
Regarding the non-relativistic approximation limit
- Static energy phase extraction is not a gauge transformation.
- Can be generalized to ? Replace with any unit element. doesn't work? Or is used for hyperbolic mass KG rather than elliptical mass KG, in one-dimensional the equation cannot be solved)
- This method of non-relativistic approximation limit is coordinate-dependent. On curved manifolds, since multiple coordinates may be needed to cover the entire manifold, the definition problem of the non-relativistic approximation limit will be more difficult.
Symmetry and Conserved Current
let
Similar to the case of relativistic scalar field, energy-momentum tensor energy-momentum-tensor-Schrodinger
_(tag)
Time
Space
Energy
Due to the zero divergence of the energy-momentum tensor, energy is conserved with respect to time ,
For non-relativistic scalar fields, the energy of the Schrodinger field is real, positive and time invariant
Rotational angular momentum is angular-momentum-Schrodinger
_(tag)
Gauge current of the Schrodinger field
Phase change and its ฮด change belong to variations with fixed boundaries near the solution, so
The spatial part of the current is similar to the relativistic case,
The time part of the current ()
The result will be the quantity
The entire current, after dividing by , is current-gauge-Schrodinger
_(tag)
The time component of the Schrodinger field gauge current is real, and the spatial component is purely imaginary
Assume is an integrable quantity in
time-invariant by conserved-spatial-integral-charge-Schrodinger
_(tag)
The time component of the Schrodinger field current is positive and its spatial integral is time invariant
Should this quantity be "particle number density" or "probability density" or "electric charge density"?
Warning No one can currently solve atoms other than hydrogen atoms using the Schrodinger equation. What form of many-particle interaction model should be used is also not an obvious matter. No repeatable evidence or downstream applications
motivation-of-quantization
_(tag)
Most treatments of quantization assume
-
Linear unitary evolution of field
-
Possibly non-free fields, so plane waves cannot be used
If the non-relativistic approximation limit of the KG field is considered, these assumptions will be automatically obtained.
Then, the time component of the static gauge field acts as the electric potential. Both the harmonic oscillator potential and the hydrogen atom potential originate from simple charge densities.
Thus, the motivation problem becomes:
-
Why use KG field?
-
Why and how does it correspond to point particles?
-
Why does the potential of a gauge field become the potential of a particle when the field is quantized into particles?
Classical correspondence refers to the expected value version of the point particle Lagrange-equation (wiki:Ehrenfest_theorem). How to make the expected value version of the point particle Lagrange-equation correspond to the Lagrange-equation of the field?
Schrodinger eq is the non-relativistic limit of KG eq, and Newton's equation is the non-relativistic limit of relativistic point particles. So, can it be proven that KG eq also has a point particle limit? At this point, should the definition of "expectation" use the charge density of 's KG (even if it's not a positive definite density)?
Other signs that the Schrodinger wave function corresponds to point particles:
-
A plane wave is a solution to the Schrodinger eq <==> . This equality cannot hold for a non-constant , but it holds in the embedded point particle solution , because the energy of the point particle is constant over time.
-
Feynman path integrals use the path statistics weighted by the point particle Lagrangian to calculate the propagator of the Schrodinger eq.
For harmonic oscillator and hydrogen atom , if we assume the phase of the wave function oscillates as and the amplitude is static , then satisfies the Schrodinger or Dirac eq <==> satisfies the eigenvalue equation for a Hermitian operator, and is discrete, for bound states of elliptic harmonic oscillators and hydrogen atoms.